About Cars

Audi A3 1 8 Tfsi Sedan 2015 Vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2014

0
(0)

Compare the Audi A3 1.8 TFSI Sedan 2015 and Citroen C4 Picasso 2014 to find out which one suits your needs better. Discover the key differences and make an informed decision.

Feature Audi A3 1.8 TFSI Sedan 2015 Citroen C4 Picasso 2014
Engine 1.8L TFSI 1.6L
Horsepower 170 hp 120 hp
Torque 250 Nm 230 Nm
Transmission 6-speed automatic 5-speed manual
Drive Type Front-wheel drive Front-wheel drive
Fuel Efficiency (Combined) 7.2 L/100km 5.3 L/100km
Seating Capacity 5 5
Cargo Space 425 liters 537 liters
Infotainment System MMI Radio plus with 5.8″ color display 7″ touchscreen with USB and Bluetooth
Safety Features ABS, ESP, airbags ABS, ESP, airbags
Dimensions (L x W x H) 4458 mm x 1796 mm x 1416 mm 4428 mm x 1826 mm x 1610 mm
Weight 1,340 kg 1,480 kg
Top Speed 232 km/h 187 km/h
Acceleration (0-100 km/h) 7.3 seconds 12.4 seconds
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol

Engine

The Audi A3 1.8 TFSI Sedan 2015 is equipped with a 1.8L TFSI engine, while the Citroen C4 Picasso 2014 has a 1.6L engine. The Audi offers more power and performance with its larger engine size.

Horsepower

The Audi A3 generates 170 horsepower, whereas the Citroen C4 Picasso produces 120 horsepower. The A3 provides a more energetic driving experience with its higher horsepower rating.

Torque

With 250 Nm of torque, the Audi A3 has a slight advantage over the Citroen C4 Picasso, which offers 230 Nm of torque. This higher torque allows for better acceleration and responsiveness.

Transmission

The Audi A3 comes with a 6-speed automatic transmission, while the Citroen C4 Picasso is equipped with a 5-speed manual transmission. The A3 offers a more convenient and effortless driving experience with its automatic gearbox.

Drive Type

Both the Audi A3 and the Citroen C4 Picasso feature front-wheel drive, providing good traction and stability on the road. This drive configuration is commonly found in compact sedans and offers a balanced handling experience.

Fuel Efficiency (Combined)

The Audi A3 has a combined fuel efficiency rating of 7.2 L/100km, whereas the Citroen C4 Picasso boasts a more fuel-efficient 5.3 L/100km. The C4 Picasso offers better fuel economy, making it a cost-effective option for daily commuting.

Seating Capacity

Both the Audi A3 and the Citroen C4 Picasso can accommodate up to five passengers. They provide ample seating space for a small family or a group of friends.

Cargo Space

The Citroen C4 Picasso offers more cargo space with 537 liters, while the Audi A3 provides 425 liters. The C4 Picasso’s larger cargo capacity makes it more suitable for carrying luggage or larger items.

Infotainment System

The Audi A3 features the MMI Radio plus with a 5.8″ color display, while the Citroen C4 Picasso is equipped with a 7″ touchscreen infotainment system with USB and Bluetooth connectivity. Both systems offer modern features for entertainment and connectivity.

Safety Features

Both the Audi A3 and the Citroen C4 Picasso are equipped with essential safety features such as ABS, ESP, and airbags. These features ensure a safer driving experience for the occupants.

Dimensions

The Audi A3 has dimensions of 4458 mm x 1796 mm x 1416 mm, whereas the Citroen C4 Picasso measures 4428 mm x 1826 mm x 1610 mm. Both cars have compact dimensions suitable for urban driving and parking.

Weight

The Audi A3 weighs 1,340 kg, while the Citroen C4 Picasso is slightly heavier at 1,480 kg. The A3’s lighter weight contributes to better agility and handling performance.

Top Speed

The Audi A3 has a top speed of 232 km/h, while the Citroen C4 Picasso reaches a maximum speed of 187 km/h. The A3 offers a higher top speed for those seeking a more exhilarating driving experience.

Acceleration (0-100 km/h)

The Audi A3 achieves 0-100 km/h acceleration in 7.3 seconds, whereas the Citroen C4 Picasso takes 12.4 seconds. The A3 delivers quicker acceleration, making it more suitable for those who enjoy spirited driving.

Fuel Type

Both the Audi A3 and the Citroen C4 Picasso run on petrol. Petrol is a widely available fuel type, ensuring convenience and accessibility for refueling.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
We use cookies in order to give you the best possible experience on our website. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
Accept