Compare the 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Sport V6 with the 2018 Toyota Avalon to see which luxury vehicle offers the best features, performance, and value. Discover the differences between these two popular models and make an informed decision on your next car purchase.
| Feature | Land Rover Range Rover Sport V6 2014 | Toyota Avalon 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | 3.0L V6 | 3.5L V6 |
| Horsepower | 340 hp | 268 hp |
| Torque | 332 lb-ft | 248 lb-ft |
| Transmission | 8-speed automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Fuel Efficiency (City) | 17 mpg | 21 mpg |
| Fuel Efficiency (Highway) | 23 mpg | 30 mpg |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Cargo Space | 27.7 cu ft | 16.0 cu ft |
| Infotainment System | 8-inch touchscreen | 7-inch touchscreen |
| Bluetooth Connectivity | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation System | Optional | Standard |
| Keyless Entry | Yes | Yes |
| Safety Features | Multiple airbags, ABS, traction control | Multiple airbags, ABS, traction control |
Engine
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport V6 2014 is equipped with a 3.0L V6 engine, while the Toyota Avalon 2018 has a 3.5L V6 engine. This indicates that both vehicles offer sufficient power and performance for their respective classes.
Horsepower and Torque
The Range Rover Sport V6 boasts 340 horsepower and 332 lb-ft of torque, surpassing the Avalon’s 268 horsepower and 248 lb-ft of torque. This suggests that the Range Rover delivers more robust acceleration and towing capabilities compared to the Avalon.
Transmission and Drive Type
Both vehicles come with automatic transmissions, but the Range Rover Sport V6 offers an 8-speed automatic, while the Avalon has a 6-speed automatic. Additionally, the Range Rover features four-wheel drive, whereas the Avalon is front-wheel drive. This indicates that the Range Rover may provide better off-road capability and handling in challenging conditions.
Fuel Efficiency
The Avalon demonstrates better fuel efficiency with an estimated 21 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway, compared to the Range Rover’s 17 mpg in the city and 23 mpg on the highway. This suggests that the Avalon may offer more economical fuel consumption for daily commuting and long-distance driving.
Seating Capacity and Cargo Space
Both vehicles have a seating capacity of five people. However, the Range Rover Sport V6 provides more spacious cargo space with 27.7 cubic feet compared to the Avalon’s 16.0 cubic feet. This implies that the Range Rover offers more versatility for carrying luggage or larger items.
Infotainment and Technology
Both vehicles come with touchscreen infotainment systems and Bluetooth connectivity. The Range Rover Sport V6 features an 8-inch touchscreen, while the Avalon has a slightly smaller 7-inch touchscreen. Additionally, the Avalon offers a standard navigation system, whereas it is optional in the Range Rover. Both vehicles provide keyless entry and various safety features.
Our Users Have Also Done These Searches For Related Posts:
