About Cars

Volkswagen Eos Cc 1 4 Tsi 160 Sport 2dr 2014 Vs Bmw 320i Sedan 2014

0
(0)

Compare the Volkswagen Eos CC 1.4 TSI 160 Sport 2dr 2014 with the BMW 320i Sedan 2014 in terms of performance, features, and specifications. Discover which car offers a better driving experience and value for money.

Feature Volkswagen Eos Cc 1 4 Tsi 160 Sport 2dr 2014 BMW 320i Sedan 2014
Engine 1.4L TSI 4-cylinder 2.0L 4-cylinder
Horsepower 160 hp 180 hp
Torque 177 lb-ft 200 lb-ft
Transmission 6-speed Manual 8-speed Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive Rear-Wheel Drive
Fuel Efficiency (City) 23 mpg 24 mpg
Fuel Efficiency (Highway) 34 mpg 36 mpg
Seating Capacity 4 5
Length 173.5 inches 182.5 inches
Width 70.5 inches 71.3 inches
Height 56.8 inches 56.3 inches
Curb Weight 3,362 lbs 3,373 lbs
0-60 mph 8.1 seconds 7.1 seconds
Top Speed 135 mph 146 mph
Front Headroom 37.4 inches 40.3 inches
Rear Headroom 36.3 inches 37.7 inches
Front Legroom 41.5 inches 42 inches
Rear Legroom 32.5 inches 35.1 inches
Trunk Space 10.5 cubic feet 13 cubic feet
Navigation System Optional Optional
Bluetooth Connectivity Standard Standard
Keyless Entry Standard Standard
Backup Camera Optional Optional
Leather Seats Optional Optional

Engine

The Volkswagen Eos Cc 1 4 Tsi 160 Sport 2dr 2014 is equipped with a 1.4L TSI 4-cylinder engine, while the BMW 320i Sedan 2014 comes with a 2.0L 4-cylinder engine. The BMW offers slightly more power with 180 horsepower compared to the Volkswagen’s 160 horsepower. Both engines provide a good balance between performance and fuel efficiency.

Transmission and Drive Type

The Eos Cc 1 4 Tsi 160 Sport 2dr 2014 offers a 6-speed manual transmission, while the BMW 320i Sedan 2014 features an 8-speed automatic transmission. The Volkswagen has front-wheel drive, whereas the BMW has rear-wheel drive. The transmission options provide different driving experiences, with the manual transmission offering more control and the automatic transmission providing smoother shifts.

Fuel Efficiency

When it comes to fuel efficiency, the BMW 320i Sedan 2014 has a slight advantage. It offers 24 mpg in the city and 36 mpg on the highway, while the Volkswagen Eos Cc 1 4 Tsi 160 Sport 2dr 2014 provides 23 mpg in the city and 34 mpg on the highway. Both vehicles offer decent fuel efficiency for their respective classes.

Dimensions and Weight

The BMW 320i Sedan 2014 is slightly larger than the Volkswagen Eos Cc 1 4 Tsi 160 Sport 2dr 2014. The BMW has a length of 182.5 inches, width of 71.3 inches, and height of 56.3 inches. In comparison, the Volkswagen measures 173.5 inches in length, 70.5 inches in width, and 56.8 inches in height. The weight of both cars is quite similar, with the BMW weighing 3,373 lbs and the Volkswagen weighing 3,362 lbs.

Performance

In terms of performance, the BMW 320i Sedan 2014 outperforms the Volkswagen Eos Cc 1 4 Tsi 160 Sport 2dr 2014. The BMW accelerates from 0 to 60 mph in 7.1 seconds, while the Volkswagen takes 8.1 seconds. The BMW also has a higher top speed of 146 mph compared to the Volkswagen’s 135 mph. However, both cars offer a comfortable and enjoyable driving experience.

Interior Space and Features

The BMW 320i Sedan 2014 has a seating capacity of 5, while the Volkswagen Eos Cc 1 4 Tsi 160 Sport 2dr 2014 can accommodate 4 passengers. The BMW provides more headroom and legroom in both the front and rear seats compared to the Volkswagen. Additionally, the BMW offers a larger trunk space of 13 cubic feet, while the Volkswagen provides 10.5 cubic feet. Both cars offer optional features such as navigation system, Bluetooth connectivity, keyless entry, backup camera, and leather seats.

These comparisons provide an overview of the key differences and similarities between the Volkswagen Eos Cc 1 4 Tsi 160 Sport 2dr 2014 and the BMW 320i Sedan 2014. It’s important to consider your preferences in terms of engine power, transmission type, fuel efficiency, dimensions, performance, and interior space when making a decision between these two models.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
We use cookies in order to give you the best possible experience on our website. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
Accept