Compare the Ford Galaxy 1.6 160 Ecoboost 2014 and the Seat Alhambra SE 2014 to find out which one is the better choice for you. Explore their features, performance, and specifications to make an informed decision.
| Feature | Ford Galaxy 1.6 160 Ecoboost 2014 | Seat Alhambra SE 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | 1.6L Ecoboost | 2.0L TDI |
| Horsepower | 160 hp | 140 hp |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-speed Manual | 6-speed Manual |
| Fuel Efficiency (Combined) | 7.0 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
| Seating Capacity | 7 | 7 |
| Cargo Space | Up to 2320 liters | Up to 2297 liters |
| Infotainment System | Ford SYNC | SEAT Media System |
| Bluetooth Connectivity | Yes | Yes |
| Keyless Entry | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Rear | Rear |
| Backup Camera | Optional | Optional |
| Safety Features | Airbags, ABS, Stability Control | Airbags, ABS, Stability Control |
| Dimensions (LxWxH) | 4820mm x 1884mm x 1764mm | 4854mm x 1904mm x 1720mm |
| Curb Weight | 1696 kg | 1763 kg |
Engine
The Ford Galaxy 1.6 160 Ecoboost 2014 is equipped with a 1.6L Ecoboost engine, while the Seat Alhambra SE 2014 has a 2.0L TDI engine. The Ford Galaxy offers a slightly smaller engine size but provides a good balance between power and efficiency.
Horsepower
The Ford Galaxy generates 160 horsepower, whereas the Seat Alhambra produces 140 horsepower. This gives the Ford Galaxy a slight advantage in terms of power output.
Torque
With 240 Nm of torque, the Ford Galaxy falls slightly behind the Seat Alhambra, which offers 320 Nm of torque. Higher torque allows for better acceleration and towing capabilities.
Transmission
Both vehicles come with a 6-speed manual transmission, providing drivers with control over gear shifting. The manual transmission offers a more engaging driving experience.
Fuel Efficiency (Combined)
The Ford Galaxy has a combined fuel efficiency of 7.0 L/100km, while the Seat Alhambra boasts a slightly better fuel efficiency of 6.2 L/100km. The Seat Alhambra is more fuel-efficient, potentially saving on fuel costs over time.
Seating Capacity
Both the Ford Galaxy and Seat Alhambra offer a seating capacity of 7, making them suitable for larger families or groups. The spacious interior ensures comfort for all passengers.
Cargo Space
The Ford Galaxy provides up to 2320 liters of cargo space, slightly more than the Seat Alhambra’s 2297 liters. Both vehicles offer ample room for luggage, groceries, or other cargo needs.
Infotainment System
The Ford Galaxy is equipped with the Ford SYNC infotainment system, while the Seat Alhambra features the SEAT Media System. Both systems offer connectivity and entertainment features to enhance the driving experience.
Bluetooth Connectivity
Both the Ford Galaxy and Seat Alhambra come with Bluetooth connectivity, allowing drivers to connect their smartphones for hands-free calling and audio streaming.
Keyless Entry
Both vehicles offer keyless entry, allowing for convenient access to the vehicle without needing to use a physical key. This feature adds convenience and ease of use.
Parking Sensors
Both the Ford Galaxy and Seat Alhambra are equipped with rear parking sensors, assisting drivers during parking maneuvers by providing audible alerts when approaching obstacles.
Backup Camera
Both vehicles offer the option of a backup camera, providing a clear view of the area behind the vehicle to aid in reversing and parking. This enhances safety and reduces the risk of accidents.
Safety Features
Both the Ford Galaxy and Seat Alhambra are equipped with essential safety features such as airbags, ABS (anti-lock braking system), and stability control. These features contribute to occupant safety and vehicle stability.
Dimensions (LxWxH)
The Ford Galaxy measures 4820mm in length, 1884mm in width, and 1764mm in height. The Seat Alhambra has slightly larger dimensions, measuring 4854mm in length, 1904mm in width, and 1720mm in height.
Curb Weight
The Ford Galaxy has a curb weight of 1696 kg, while the Seat Alhambra weighs slightly more at 1763 kg. The weight difference may impact factors such as handling and fuel efficiency.
Our Users Have Also Done These Searches For Related Posts:
