About Cars

Jaguar Xf 2014 Vs Mercedes Benz E250 Bluetec Sedan 2014

0
(0)

The Jaguar XF 2014 and the Mercedes Benz E250 Bluetec Sedan 2014 are two luxury car models that offer exceptional performance and style. In this article, we compare these two vehicles to help you make an informed decision on which one suits your preferences and needs.

Feature Jaguar XF 2014 Mercedes Benz E250 Bluetec Sedan 2014
Engine 2.0L Turbocharged Inline-4 2.1L Turbocharged Inline-4
Horsepower 240 hp 195 hp
Torque 251 lb-ft 369 lb-ft
Transmission 8-speed Automatic 7-speed Automatic
Drivetrain Rear-Wheel Drive Rear-Wheel Drive
Fuel Efficiency (City) 19 mpg 28 mpg
Fuel Efficiency (Highway) 30 mpg 42 mpg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Length 195.3 inches 192.1 inches
Width 73.9 inches 73 inches
Height 57.5 inches 57.9 inches
Curb Weight 3,770 lbs 3,825 lbs
0-60 mph 6.4 seconds 7.5 seconds
Top Speed 155 mph 130 mph
Front Headroom 37.1 inches 37.9 inches
Rear Headroom 37.6 inches 38.2 inches

Engine

The Jaguar XF 2014 is equipped with a 2.0L Turbocharged Inline-4 engine, while the Mercedes Benz E250 Bluetec Sedan 2014 has a 2.1L Turbocharged Inline-4 engine. Both engines offer decent power and performance for their respective models.

Horsepower

The Jaguar XF 2014 delivers 240 horsepower, whereas the Mercedes Benz E250 Bluetec Sedan 2014 offers 195 horsepower. The Jaguar XF has a slight advantage in terms of horsepower, providing a more energetic driving experience.

Torque

When it comes to torque, the Jaguar XF 2014 produces 251 lb-ft, while the Mercedes Benz E250 Bluetec Sedan 2014 boasts an impressive 369 lb-ft of torque. The Mercedes Benz E250 offers higher torque, resulting in better acceleration and towing capability.

Transmission

Both vehicles come with automatic transmissions. The Jaguar XF 2014 is equipped with an 8-speed automatic transmission, while the Mercedes Benz E250 Bluetec Sedan 2014 features a 7-speed automatic transmission. These transmissions provide smooth and efficient gear shifts.

Drivetrain

Both the Jaguar XF 2014 and the Mercedes Benz E250 Bluetec Sedan 2014 have rear-wheel drive, which offers better handling and balance. Rear-wheel drive provides a more engaging driving experience, especially in terms of cornering and overall performance.

Fuel Efficiency

The Mercedes Benz E250 Bluetec Sedan 2014 delivers better fuel efficiency compared to the Jaguar XF 2014. The E250 achieves an impressive 28 mpg in the city and 42 mpg on the highway, while the XF offers 19 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway.

Seating Capacity

Both the Jaguar XF 2014 and the Mercedes Benz E250 Bluetec Sedan 2014 can accommodate up to five passengers comfortably. They provide ample space for occupants, making them suitable for small families or groups of friends.

Dimensions

The Jaguar XF 2014 is slightly longer, measuring 195.3 inches, compared to the Mercedes Benz E250 Bluetec Sedan 2014, which is 192.1 inches long. In terms of width and height, the XF is wider at 73.9 inches, while the E250 is taller at 57.9 inches.

Curb Weight

The Jaguar XF 2014 has a curb weight of 3,770 lbs, while the Mercedes Benz E250 Bluetec Sedan 2014 weighs slightly more at 3,825 lbs. The difference in weight may have a slight impact on handling and fuel efficiency.

Acceleration

The Jaguar XF 2014 achieves a faster 0-60 mph time, taking just 6.4 seconds, compared to the Mercedes Benz E250 Bluetec Sedan 2014, which takes 7.5 seconds. The XF provides quicker acceleration, making it more suitable for those seeking a sportier driving experience.

Top Speed

The Jaguar XF 2014 has a higher top speed of 155 mph, while the Mercedes Benz E250 Bluetec Sedan 2014 has a top speed of 130 mph. The XF offers a higher maximum speed, which may appeal to those who enjoy high-performance driving.

Headroom

The Jaguar XF 2014 provides 37.1 inches of front headroom and 37.6 inches of rear headroom. On the other hand, the Mercedes Benz E250 Bluetec Sedan 2014 offers 37.9 inches of front headroom and 38.2 inches of rear headroom. Both vehicles provide sufficient headroom for passengers.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
We use cookies in order to give you the best possible experience on our website. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
Accept