Compare the Land Rover Freelander 2 S 2 2 Ed4 Diesel Manual 2013 with the Subaru Forester 2 5i 2015. Discover the key differences between these two popular SUVs and make an informed decision on which one suits your needs best.
| Feature | Land Rover Freelander 2 S 2.2 Ed4 Diesel Manual 2013 | Subaru Forester 2.5i 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | 2.2L 4-cylinder Diesel | 2.5L 4-cylinder Petrol |
| Horsepower | 150 hp | 170 hp |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 235 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-speed Manual | 6-speed Manual |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Fuel Efficiency | 6.2 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Cargo Space | 755 liters | 974 liters |
| Ground Clearance | 210 mm | 220 mm |
| Length | 4500 mm | 4595 mm |
| Width | 1910 mm | 1795 mm |
| Height | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1783 kg | 1506 kg |
| Max Towing Capacity | 2000 kg | 1500 kg |
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut | MacPherson Strut |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Double Wishbone |
| Infotainment System | 7-inch touchscreen, Bluetooth, USB | 6.2-inch touchscreen, Bluetooth, USB |
| Safety Features | Airbags, ABS, Stability Control | Airbags, ABS, Stability Control |
Engine
The Land Rover Freelander 2 S 2.2 Ed4 Diesel Manual 2013 is equipped with a 2.2L 4-cylinder Diesel engine, while the Subaru Forester 2.5i 2015 has a 2.5L 4-cylinder Petrol engine. The Subaru Forester offers slightly higher horsepower at 170 hp compared to the Freelander’s 150 hp. However, the Freelander has a significantly higher torque of 420 Nm compared to the Forester’s 235 Nm.
Transmission and Drivetrain
Both vehicles come with a 6-speed manual transmission. The Freelander has a 4WD (four-wheel drive) system, providing enhanced off-road capabilities, while the Forester comes with an AWD (all-wheel drive) system, offering improved traction and stability on various terrains.
Fuel Efficiency
The Land Rover Freelander 2 S 2.2 Ed4 Diesel Manual 2013 boasts better fuel efficiency, consuming around 6.2 L/100km compared to the Subaru Forester 2.5i 2015, which consumes approximately 8.1 L/100km. This makes the Freelander a more economical choice in terms of fuel consumption.
Dimensions and Weight
The Freelander has a length of 4500 mm, width of 1910 mm, and height of 1740 mm, while the Forester measures 4595 mm in length, 1795 mm in width, and 1700 mm in height. The Freelander is slightly heavier with a curb weight of 1783 kg, whereas the Forester weighs 1506 kg. Additionally, the Forester offers more cargo space with 974 liters compared to the Freelander’s 755 liters.
Ground Clearance
The Subaru Forester has a higher ground clearance of 220 mm, providing better capability to tackle uneven terrains and obstacles. The Freelander, on the other hand, offers a ground clearance of 210 mm, which is still suitable for most off-road adventures.
Towing Capacity
The Land Rover Freelander 2 S 2.2 Ed4 Diesel Manual 2013 has a maximum towing capacity of 2000 kg, while the Subaru Forester 2.5i 2015 can tow up to 1500 kg. This makes the Freelander a better choice for those needing to tow heavier loads.
Suspension and Safety
Both vehicles feature MacPherson Strut front suspension, providing a comfortable ride. However, the Freelander has a Multi-Link rear suspension, while the Forester has a Double Wishbone rear suspension, which may offer slightly different handling characteristics. Both vehicles are equipped with airbags, ABS (Anti-lock Braking System), and stability control for enhanced safety.
Infotainment System
The Land Rover Freelander 2 S 2.2 Ed4 Diesel Manual 2013 comes with a 7-inch touchscreen infotainment system, Bluetooth connectivity, and USB ports. The Subaru Forester 2.5i 2015 features a 6.2-inch touchscreen infotainment system, Bluetooth connectivity, and USB ports. Both systems provide convenient connectivity options for entertainment and communication.
Overall, the Land Rover Freelander 2 S 2.2 Ed4 Diesel Manual 2013 offers a powerful diesel engine, better fuel efficiency, and higher towing capacity. The Subaru Forester 2.5i 2015, on the other hand, provides a slightly higher horsepower, more cargo space, and a higher ground clearance. The choice between these two vehicles ultimately depends on individual preferences and specific needs.
Our Users Have Also Done These Searches For Related Posts:
