About Cars

Volkswagen Golf Se 2015 Vs Suzuki Swift 1 6 Sport 2014

0
(0)

Compare the Volkswagen Golf SE 2015 and the Suzuki Swift 1.6 Sport 2014 to make an informed decision on which car suits your needs. Discover the key features, performance, and specifications of both models to find the perfect vehicle for you.

Feature Volkswagen Golf Se 2015 Suzuki Swift 1.6 Sport 2014
Engine 1.8L 4-cylinder 1.6L 4-cylinder
Horsepower 170 hp 134 hp
Torque 200 lb-ft 118 lb-ft
Transmission 6-speed automatic 6-speed manual
Drivetrain Front-wheel drive Front-wheel drive
Fuel Efficiency (City) 25 mpg 27 mpg
Fuel Efficiency (Highway) 36 mpg 34 mpg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Cargo Space 22.8 cu ft 12.6 cu ft
Infotainment System 6.5-inch touchscreen 7-inch touchscreen
Bluetooth Yes Yes
USB Ports 1 1
Keyless Entry Yes No
Backup Camera Yes No
Safety Features ABS, traction control, stability control ABS, traction control, stability control

Engine

The Volkswagen Golf Se 2015 is equipped with a 1.8L 4-cylinder engine, while the Suzuki Swift 1.6 Sport 2014 has a 1.6L 4-cylinder engine. The Golf offers a slightly larger engine size, which may result in improved performance and power.

Horsepower

The Golf Se 2015 boasts 170 horsepower, whereas the Swift 1.6 Sport 2014 has 134 horsepower. This means that the Golf provides a higher power output, potentially delivering a more energetic driving experience.

Torque

With 200 lb-ft of torque, the Golf Se 2015 offers more twisting force compared to the Swift 1.6 Sport 2014, which provides 118 lb-ft of torque. The higher torque of the Golf may contribute to better acceleration and pulling power.

Transmission

The Golf Se 2015 is equipped with a 6-speed automatic transmission, while the Swift 1.6 Sport 2014 features a 6-speed manual transmission. The automatic transmission in the Golf offers convenience and ease of use, while the manual transmission in the Swift allows for more control and engagement.

Drivetrain

Both the Golf Se 2015 and the Swift 1.6 Sport 2014 have front-wheel drive, providing traction to the front wheels. Front-wheel drive offers good handling and fuel efficiency, making it suitable for everyday driving conditions.

Fuel Efficiency

The Golf Se 2015 delivers an estimated fuel efficiency of 25 mpg in the city and 36 mpg on the highway. On the other hand, the Swift 1.6 Sport 2014 offers slightly better fuel efficiency with 27 mpg in the city and 34 mpg on the highway. Both vehicles provide decent fuel economy for their respective classes.

Seating Capacity

Both the Golf Se 2015 and the Swift 1.6 Sport 2014 have a seating capacity of 5 people. They offer ample space for passengers, making them suitable for small families or groups of friends.

Cargo Space

The Golf Se 2015 provides 22.8 cubic feet of cargo space, while the Swift 1.6 Sport 2014 offers 12.6 cubic feet. The Golf’s larger cargo capacity makes it more practical for carrying bulky items or luggage.

Infotainment System

The Golf Se 2015 features a 6.5-inch touchscreen infotainment system, whereas the Swift 1.6 Sport 2014 is equipped with a slightly larger 7-inch touchscreen. Both systems offer intuitive controls and access to various entertainment and connectivity features.

Bluetooth

Both the Golf Se 2015 and the Swift 1.6 Sport 2014 come with Bluetooth connectivity, allowing users to wirelessly connect their devices and make hands-free calls or stream audio.

USB Ports

Both vehicles offer 1 USB port, enabling users to connect and charge their devices conveniently.

Keyless Entry

The Golf Se 2015 includes keyless entry, allowing users to unlock and start the vehicle without using a physical key. However, the Swift 1.6 Sport 2014 does not offer this feature.

Backup Camera

Only the Golf Se 2015 is equipped with a backup camera, providing enhanced visibility and ease of parking. The Swift 1.6 Sport 2014 does not have this feature.

Safety Features

Both the Golf Se 2015 and the Swift 1.6 Sport 2014 are equipped with essential safety features such as ABS, traction control, and stability control. These features contribute to better handling and increased safety on the road.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
We use cookies in order to give you the best possible experience on our website. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
Accept